The river is a physical boundary between the two races, and which is clearly supposed by Lewis to denote the transition between the real and magical worlds.
Here's something to look for if you do choose to see it. Even at the end, the youngest is repelled by yucky kissing. Yet as the war actually approaches, they act precisely like children. These characters were supposed to have lived full lives and then be returned to children's bodies but with the wisdom of ages.
Perhaps there were many subversives on the set. Its almost so obvious it seems deliberate. All I could see was the stronger allegory of patriotic armies being led to mindless slaughter because of truculent leaders, and in the case of the "good guys" a young fellow who reminded me so much of the current US president. This is therefore more tedious than the first. While the film itself was boring, her presence and her subversive activity, was wonderful. This is the witch that is supposed to represent the evil, anti-Christian forces, but she played her as an Arian representing the abuse of religious argument. Tilda Swinton an intriguing person insisted on portraying her character in a certain way. But it was subverted without the knowledge of those pinched faces. Yes, it was aggressively allegorical, at the insistence of Lewis' wildeyed nephew who controls the rights. Yes, it was the same tiresome stuff we have from a dozen other sources about children in mystical or magical contexts who save the world.
DOWNLOAD FINAL FANTASY XII OST TORRENT MOVIE
The first movie was an amazing surprise for me. The Narnia books are in this same questionable class. I am convinced that when they get better than their clumsy current efforts, we may be in for a rough ride. The idea is to blanket us with convincing fundamentalist propaganda. I live in Virginia Beach where Pat Robertson's billion dollar film school is located.